Monday, February 22, 2021

Book Review - George Whitefield [Abridged] by Arnold Dallimore

George WhitefieldGeorge Whitefield by Arnold A. Dallimore
My rating: ⭐⭐⭐

You should read this if: You're interested in a fairly short overview of George Whitfield's life from various accounts, particularly his relationship with the Wesleys. Or if you're already very familiar with Whitfield's life and teaching and are interested in the primary sources presented.

You should not read this if: You're looking to learn about Whitfield's theological beliefs in-depth. Or if historical white-washing and hero worship turn you off.

Review

"George Whitfield was a great preacher who seemed to have a big influence, and everyone liked him. Except for John Wesley at first, but even he liked him in the end." Along with some historical details, that's basically the whole book. Given this is an abridgement of a much larger volume which I haven't read, the brevity on some topics is understandable but the outcome is underwhelming. While some details of Whitfield's life were interesting (I did not realize the extent of his travels between America and Europe), there's a noticeable lack of depth presented on Whitfield as a real human being, sinner but saved by grace. My view and knowledge of Whitfield is fairly unchanged before and after reading this book - he was a great evangelist who people loved to hear from.

Perhaps my judgement on this biography is shaped by a more modern, critical approach to viewing historical persons, but the effusive praise ends up giving a very shallow view of George Whitfield. What were his weaknesses and struggles? Other than his failure to repudiate slavery and being a slave owner (a significant issue which is addressed too briefly), what other failures did he have? What doubts or fears did Whitfield have, or was he really the superman presented who feared nothing? Is the sum of a man's life really just his external deeds and accomplishments? Instead of a well-rounded, relatable human being, we're presented with an essentially infallible figure, which is both certainly unrealistic but also unsatisfying to read.

This biography doesn't attempt to describe particular theological beliefs, denominations, or church structures, so only those with the appropriate background will be able to understand and appreciate some of the discussion. Readers are not presented with any background to what Calvinism is, Biblical support for or against predestination, or what a Maldovian is. While in-depth descriptions are likely intentionally avoided in this short biography, these omissions make the book significantly less accessible and difficult to recommend.

View all my reviews

No comments:

Post a Comment